Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /home/marvell/public_html/drupal/index.php:2) in /home/marvell/public_html/drupal/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 995

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /home/marvell/public_html/drupal/index.php:2) in /home/marvell/public_html/drupal/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 995

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/marvell/public_html/drupal/index.php:2) in /home/marvell/public_html/drupal/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 596

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/marvell/public_html/drupal/index.php:2) in /home/marvell/public_html/drupal/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 597

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/marvell/public_html/drupal/index.php:2) in /home/marvell/public_html/drupal/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 598

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/marvell/public_html/drupal/index.php:2) in /home/marvell/public_html/drupal/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 599
Freedom of Speech Freedom of Speech http://marvellousmelbourne.org/drupal/?q=taxonomy/term/5/atom/feed 2008-07-07T08:20:48-04:00 Anti-corruption???? http://marvellousmelbourne.org/drupal/?q=node/1227 2010-06-06T22:57:50-04:00 2010-06-06T22:57:50-04:00 Editor2 We know an election is coming when Brumby announces he will set up an anti-corruption committee (mind you not for 18 months) but he still won't let Peta Duke appear before the Upper House committee investigating the Windsor Hotel scandal.
What will the committee do now - have her arrested for contempt of Parliament?

See link. http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/brumby-rejects-adviser-scrutiny-20100606-xn9r.html

]]>
We know an election is coming when Brumby announces he will set up an anti-corruption committee (mind you not for 18 months) but he still won't let Peta Duke appear before the Upper House committee investigating the Windsor Hotel scandal.
What will the committee do now - have her arrested for contempt of Parliament?

See link. http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/brumby-rejects-adviser-scrutiny-20100606-xn9r.html

]]>
Behind-closed-doors planning procedures. http://marvellousmelbourne.org/drupal/?q=node/1208 2010-05-24T06:26:44-04:00 2010-05-24T06:26:44-04:00 Editor2

When is a Hearing NOT a Hearing?

When Minister Madden meets with the Developers and then calls in an appalling  application for 39 storeys in the middle of the traffic jam that is Box Hill Station and then he gives it to a Panel - read on. . .

]]>

When is a Hearing NOT a Hearing?

When Minister Madden meets with the Developers and then calls in an appalling  application for 39 storeys in the middle of the traffic jam that is Box Hill Station and then he gives it to a Panel - read on. . .

Developers for the Station Street Box Hill, 39-storey tower, Barton Australia Group, met with the Minister for Planning who then called in the VCAT Application for Review of the Whitehorse Council decision to refuse a planning permit. The Minister appointed two senior planning officers from his department who conducted a hearing on 15 & 16 February, 2010.

WERA, a Baptist Church representative and another resident presented submissions on the afternoon of 15 Feb. However we were not permitted to hear the Council’s submission in the morning, nor were we permitted to hear VICROADS after us or the developer’s submission the next morning. It was therefore not possible to question other submissions or expert witnesses as would occur at VCAT.

 



This caught the eye of Robert Clark, [MP Box Hill], who brought the matter forward in Parliament...


Planning: Box Hill development 

Mr CLARK (Box Hill) -- A local resident group in my electorate has provided a graphic demonstration of the farce into which Labor's planning call-in procedures have descended. The West of Elgar Residents Association (WERA) reports in its April newsletter that residents who attended a hearing by two departmental planning officers were not even permitted to listen to the submissions being made by other parties, including Whitehorse City Council, VicRoads and the developer. Residents therefore had no way of questioning or responding to what any other party said. This is a denial of one of the fundamental principles of natural justice -- the right to know of and to be able to respond to the other side of the argument. It shows yet again how appalling is Labor's conduct of its behind-closed-doors planning procedures. 

Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal hearings are far from perfect themselves, but at least they allow and require the arguments and evidence to be presented in public and to be subjected to public questioning and scrutiny. 

Perhaps the government figures it need not bother with any real hearing process at all because it has already made up its mind what the outcome of this tower application will be, just like the planned sham Windsorconsultation. The decision on this tower will have profound consequences for the future of Box Hill. WERA and others have raised crucial issues regarding parking shortfalls, overshadowing, wind effects, pedestrian connections, traffic congestion and the precedent for future building heights, all of which deserve careful and thorough investigation and consideration. As I have said previously, the call-in is an appalling and unjustified removal of the community's rights, for which the Brumby government has given no good reason. 

]]>
Orwellian manipulation at its worst. http://marvellousmelbourne.org/drupal/?q=node/1206 2010-05-24T06:15:06-04:00 2010-05-24T06:15:06-04:00 Editor2 Hi SOS Members
 
I have just returned today from being an invited  panel participant in an elaborate Council run "consultation" of the Warringah community on the residential planning of that area.  I had been invited to provide an alternative viewpoint to that of developers and planners.
 
640 delegates were registered to attend, of whom 500 had been selected from the community.  They were told that the State Government has decreed that 10,300 new dwellings have to go into the council area.  It is up to Warringah Council to determine how this is to be done and the consultation was to help the Council ascertain what the community feels about various possibilities.

 

]]>
Hi SOS Members
 
I have just returned today from being an invited  panel participant in an elaborate Council run "consultation" of the Warringah community on the residential planning of that area.  I had been invited to provide an alternative viewpoint to that of developers and planners.
 
640 delegates were registered to attend, of whom 500 had been selected from the community.  They were told that the State Government has decreed that 10,300 new dwellings have to go into the council area.  It is up to Warringah Council to determine how this is to be done and the consultation was to help the Council ascertain what the community feels about various possibilities.

 

On arrival I was introduced to the Mayor and the Council General Manager.  After I sat down at my seat with the two other panel participants the seminar facilitator came to our table and said that on no account was the Government decision that 10,300 new dwellings go into the Council area be queried.  The General Manager then also came up to us with the same message.  They are terrified that if the community shows any dissent on this decision, the planning powers of the Council will be taken away and a plan just imposed on the community by the State Department of Planning.  Better to have some say than none at all.
 
I dutifully decided to scrap my prepared speech to avoid stirring up the 640 delegates and made some drastic changes.  As it turned out, when we got on stage the panel participants were not even given the opportunity to make any speeches - merely asked to respond to a series of questions from the facilitator.  I was able to get a few points across such as high-density is less sustainable than low density, that job opportunities will not eventuate next to high-rise due to congestion and high land cost and that infrastructure will become hopelessly overloaded. One could detect that the audience was totally opposed to the imposition of 10,300 dwellings but dutifully kept these feelings to themselves.
 
How can this process be called "engaging" with the community when those involved are forbidden to discuss the central premise?  This is Orwellian manipulation at its worst.
 
What I wanted to say, but out of respect for the wishes of my hosts did not, was:
 

If Warringah residents do not want 10,300 extra dwellings the State planning officials should be requested to rethink their strategy and to come up with something that is better suited to the wishes of the community.  After all, Government exists for the best interests of the  people.  The community does not exist for the benefit of Government.  The ultimate authority should lie with the community and, with regard to the whole broad picture, they should be asked what they really want.

 

Maybe we will have the opportunity to say this during the forthcoming state election campaign!
 
Tony Recsei
President

 

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Website:  www.sos.org.au                                 YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/Wildhiland       

                                    Blog: http://www.sosnsw.blogspot.com

]]>
Protesters hail Mary http://marvellousmelbourne.org/drupal/?q=node/1184 2010-05-13T00:11:20-04:00 2010-05-13T00:11:20-04:00 Editor2 IT WAS a surprise to many at the "Save the Windsor" rally that planning campaigner Mary Drost spoke in Indonesian, her message directed to the hotel's developer, Adi Halim. She said: "You developers have wrecked Jakarta, don't come here and wreck Melbourne." The formidable Mary may be synonymous with Camberwell but she lived in Indonesia for 21 years, considers it her second home and received an award in the 1970s for her volunteer work in aiding Jakarta's development. After the Windsor rally, she picked up the phone and arranged a meeting with Halim. She's savi ng her terse words for when a wrecking ball swings into town again.

Suzanne Carbono
The AGE 
27 April 2010

 

]]>
IT WAS a surprise to many at the "Save the Windsor" rally that planning campaigner Mary Drost spoke in Indonesian, her message directed to the hotel's developer, Adi Halim. She said: "You developers have wrecked Jakarta, don't come here and wreck Melbourne." The formidable Mary may be synonymous with Camberwell but she lived in Indonesia for 21 years, considers it her second home and received an award in the 1970s for her volunteer work in aiding Jakarta's development. After the Windsor rally, she picked up the phone and arranged a meeting with Halim. She's savi ng her terse words for when a wrecking ball swings into town again.

Suzanne Carbono
The AGE 
27 April 2010

 

]]>
THIS DOES NOT HAPPEN IN YOUR COUNCIL OR DOES IT? http://marvellousmelbourne.org/drupal/?q=node/673 2009-01-08T23:02:05-05:00 2009-01-08T23:04:59-05:00 Mary Drost

Click to see rest of cartoon....

]]>

Click to see rest of cartoon....

]]>
Award of costs against Blue Wedges a threat to all of us and a threat to democracy http://marvellousmelbourne.org/drupal/?q=node/214 2008-07-16T11:49:16-04:00 2008-07-16T11:54:03-04:00 Anonymous Sheila Newman has reproduced on our site candobetter.org the media release of Greens MLA Sue Pennicuik concerning the awarding of court costs against Blue Wedges. They were awarded reluctantly by the Judge because the Victorian Government insisted.

]]>
Sheila Newman has reproduced on our site candobetter.org the media release of Greens MLA Sue Pennicuik concerning the awarding of court costs against Blue Wedges. They were awarded reluctantly by the Judge because the Victorian Government insisted. This represents a dire threat to our democracy when a group such as Blue Wedges acting with the best interests of the public and our environment at is left, as a result of a blatantly rigged environmental impact assessment process, with no choice but to challenge the government in court.

I think we must all get behind Blue Wedges and help them in what ever way we can to overcome the terrible predicament they now find themselves in and we must raise our voices so that all those responsible for this outrage are held to account for what they have done.

]]>
Speech by Andrea Bolch - Planning Backlash Rally - July 6, 2008 http://marvellousmelbourne.org/drupal/?q=node/170 2008-07-08T02:17:11-04:00 2008-07-08T02:20:56-04:00 Mary Drost   www.yourwateryoursay.org

]]>
  www.yourwateryoursay.org

I would first like to say thank you for the invitation to come and speak today as i know this is not a forum to discuss melbourne’s water issues and the reasons why desalination is not the answer.

So thank you particularly to mary drost for the kind invitation to let me share with you briefly the story of the community group – your water your say – and what can only be described as an eye opening experience for our community.

Ywys was born on the bass coast when on the 19th june 2007, the then bracks government announced that we were to be the lucky recipients of a 40 hectare industrial water factory in our community.

To achieve this they are compulsorily acquiring 200 hectares and now talking about building a gas fired power plant alongside the desalination plant to power it.

I’m not sure if anyone knows the bass coast but it’s a beautiful, relatively rugged and unspoilt coastline.  A bit of a rarity in victoria and particularly given its close proximity to melbourne.

I’d also point out that prior to this announcement there had been zero discussions with the community or even the council so it was a complete shock to the community.

For decades the community and the council has been vigorously pursuing planning protection for the coast line through various mechanisms including heritage overlays and through government processes such as the coastal spaces strategy and the victorian coastal strategy.

With hindsight now we wonder if perhaps it would have been beter having allowed for linear development as at least it would have been housing rather than an industrial complex that will consume the land and damage the environment.

So on the one hand you have volunteers / members of the community spending thousands of hours over decades being involved in protecting the coastline from private development, in conjunction with the state government, only to find that they themselves come in over the top – using public acquisition powers – and destroy the landscape in the name of securing water for melbourne.

To me, this gets to the heart of community engagement and community participation in our democracy. 

If you want and expect people to be involved and engaged in their community and protecting the natural values for future generations then its inappropriate to effectively dump all the work that has been done and ignore the community when it suits.

From day one we have tried to engage the government in the pursuit of one question – please explaine and show the public the evaluations that you have conducted that clearly shows this desalination project is the best solution to melbourne’s water problem. 

We thought that sounded like a reasonable question but despite numerous requests from our group and from the council, nothing has been forthcoming.

In addition the government continues to claim they are consulting with the community but you have to ask – how can you have real consultation when you’ve already made the decision, announced it to the world, put out an expression of interest to business and started to build the pilot plant and tunnel out to sea?

This government believes consultation on the issue is to ask us what trees we want planted and what color to paint the factory. That’s hardly consultation.

We are continuing to fight this proposal to build the largest desalination plant in australia on the bass coast even if our legal avenues to challenge the government look limited at present. 

We decided to go down the legal path when we were faced with no other option.

When the government is not listening to you / to your community / to your council then where can you turn?

Popular mass movement is obviously one way to try to persuade the government but when you are a small community outside of melbourne, with no celebrity residents to help give you a public face - it is extremely difficult to be heard. 

Dare i say impossible!   It is difficult to win the media campaign with such limited funds and everyone is a volunteer doing this on top of their normal busy lives.

Particularly when the government publicly dismisses you as a bunch of whinners who are only concerned about their own back yard and not worried about the bigger crisis facing melbourne.

Countless hours (volunteer hours) have been spent putting together robust demand/supply analysis that show the plant is not required. They have been tested by credible experts and found to be solid.

But the response from the state government continues to simply be to dismiss you with a single sentence and not engage in the discussion.

Time and time again we are dismissed with one line responses to what is a complex issue.

In the end we decided we had to challenge the state and federal governments under the environmental laws to try to ensure that at the very least before work began on this massive project, that all the environmental assessments had been done and been made public for everyone to see and be subject to review.

We tried to include the pilot plant (that is being built as we speak) in the ees process and to bring it under the authority of the federal minister for the environment.

As you all know we failed in that legal challenge and now the governments (federal and state) are pursuing our group for court costs. 

The interesting aspect here is that clearly they know we cannot afford to pay their costs.   They had a team of qc’s, sc’s, barristers & solicitors and departmental staff.

We had one solicitor.

The balance is all wrong in this process.

The community cannot hope to put up an equal challenge to the government when we have to rely on donations and the good will of the legal profession (as was our case with michael morehead who represented us and sincere thanks goes out to him).

So at present we don’t know what the final amount will be that they will pursue us for as the state and federal governments have not yet triggered the federal court decision. 

We are obviously hoping they won’t pursue it but the problem now is that the issue just hangs there, like a sword over our head.

We can only speculate as to when or if they will decide to actually pursue us and it creates an uncertainty that they possibly think will reduce our enthusiasm or weaken our resolve.

To end i’ll finish with this comment.

Whatever happens to the your water your say action group inc., is to some extent irrelevant as it does not change the community’s opposition to the desalination plant, it in fact strengthens and invigorates our resolve to try to stop it being built. 

Not just on the bass coast but anywhere in victoria as we would not want to dump what has happened to us on any other community in victoria.

Thankyou very much for listening.

]]>
Speech by Geoffrey Rush - Planning Backlash Rally - July 6, 2008 http://marvellousmelbourne.org/drupal/?q=node/168 2008-07-07T23:43:57-04:00 2009-04-02T08:32:14-04:00 Mary Drost  This has been such an inspiring assembly.  Mostly, on this crucial topic we‘re regularly blinded by smoke and mirrors, or manipulated by goats and monkeys. Over the past five years I’ve learnt being an activist is predominantly Frustration, Anger and Despair.
Frustration – is anyone actually listening?  The media never really seems to be up to our speed.  It seems The Age won’t print a letter.  We’re depicted as faceless - or a celebrity novelty…or worse… NIMBYs….and yet I’ve never encountered such an articulate group with less selfish motives.

]]>
 This has been such an inspiring assembly.  Mostly, on this crucial topic we‘re regularly blinded by smoke and mirrors, or manipulated by goats and monkeys. Over the past five years I’ve learnt being an activist is predominantly Frustration, Anger and Despair.
Frustration – is anyone actually listening?  The media never really seems to be up to our speed.  It seems The Age won’t print a letter.  We’re depicted as faceless - or a celebrity novelty…or worse… NIMBYs….and yet I’ve never encountered such an articulate group with less selfish motives.

<!--break-->

 

 

Anger – inevitable when the minister overrides   pertinently-argued informed community opinion, then ignores councils recommendations or unanimity and then fast-tracks crap out-moded design concepts.

Despair – the Premier decides to REMOVE Councils entirely from the equation. It’s like Get Smart and the Cone of Silence.

They’d love us to crumple.  They’d love us to cave in.  They’d love us to go away.  We won’t.

My colleague Mary Drost received an abusive phone call from a Developer.  He screamed at her - “You people have got to understand there’s a TIDAL WAVE of development happening THAT YOU  CANNOT  STOP!”

I said “Mary how did you feel?”  She said “Exhilarated!  I knew we had him worried.”  She told him she would fight to the death for him to be able to express his opinion, and that he should respect the same for her.  Mary is brilliant at playing the democracy card at a crucial moment, even though we all know her to be a card-carrying anarchist.

I, too, have experienced exhilaration…Let’s talk about some of the good news…..That out-of-the-blue supreme transcendent joy.  This meeting today, of course  - but did you hear about the Eastern Arcade building in Bourke St – an exquisite, rare and intact example of Neo-Mughal or Indo-Saracenic style dating from 1872 – a beautiful 19th century hotel interior, was under the Planning Minister’s development permit destined to be pulverized.  You may remember it better as Dimmey’s….Thanks to the diligent and persistent and reasoned efforts of Cultural Historian Mimi Colligan, theatre historian Elisabeth Kumm,  and Peter Johnson, architect, all members of the Vic Theatre Trust’s sub-committee, the Ruling for demolition was overturned.  The developer must incorporate the structure into the new project, weaving its significance into the ongoing story of Melbourne.

I had a similar frisson from p2 of The Age last week when the David known as Dr Bob Brown celebrated the 25th anniversary of his and the Tasmanian Wilderness Society’s victory over the Goliath of the state’s Hydro-electric commission’s intention to flood the Franklin river valley.  You can imagine the argument at the time of the economics versus the struggle to save something of distinct, irreplaceable and astonishing beauty.  My joy came from Senator Brown humbly quoting a quarter of a century later “It showed people power could win against the odds” 

The other big inspirational buzz was hearing a few days ago about SmartGrowth - the Premier’s massive allocation of a strategic and diagnostic budget of 2.7 billion dollars over five years to develop, in association with the ingenuity and innovation of the finest minds from the post-graduate Urban architecture laboratory at RMIT and Monash University, selecting also from the disciplines of philosophy, eco-design, and cost-effective urban renewal, to establish a total design concept for Melbourne deeply examining the idealogical and economic options available with an emphasis on human capital, imagination, intelligence and an emphasis on connectivity to surrounding areas as the keys to success.  In The Age!  It will be under the watchful guidance of Professors Bob Birrell and Paul Mees, who, recently pardoned and allowed to speak his mind freely said,” The premier INSISTS we  revitalize the abandoned wastelands of those 19th Century industrial pockets of Melbourne – the so-called Brown Wedges, and find a genuine solution to the crisis of affordable housing in Melbourne – and not just as a solution for Melbourne, but as an incomparable  SmartGrowth model for other great cities in the world, simply because we believe in these sorts of things!”

(PAUSE)

I’m sorry…I lied.  SmartGrowth isn’t true.  All of that was just a weird dream I had the other night.  Please accept my apology.

…but Bob Brown eh?... an oldie but a goodie… “It showed people power could win against the odds”

A hundred or so diverse community groups from across the State have linked up over the past few years -  meetings, emails, phone-calls – all a bit on the hop, - and at a recent core-group meeting I made a proposal  that , unless a scandal broke out in the government, our greatest strength was always going to be the amassed wisdom, the collective experience and overwhelming resilience that has emerged from the astonishing breadth and power of Victoria’s  activist  base. 

It’s a motivation for each and everyone of us to sense, from today’s representation the scale of our enterprise.  We will never be able to meet regularly like this to maintain our momentum.  This town hall  is probably earmarked to become a Planning Brothel and Casino.  Or a Developers’ Museum…photos of high rise…archaeological chunks of  three year old concrete on display…

So I proposed a website.  We are not necessarily joined by politics or geography but we are certainly united in purpose and passion and expertise.

Believe it or not we scored Marvellous Melbourne.org but of course it must needs always be followed by City Country and Coast to truly represent us.   The specifics of each individual community will be respected on the site, drawing all of us together under our common focus.

The site must always be organic and grow accordingly.  Thanks to the collaboration and diligence of Stephen Digby we have kicked off the site as a work in progress.

Please log on and make suggestions, file your reports, air your grievances, your gossip, your history, breaking news,……and most importantly invite cautious but curious visitors to join in.  Let’s raise the level of debate to the highest and most esoteric and informed international standards but also let’s not scare people away who also have an untested opinion about the future of their habitat.  OUR STRENGTH WILL COME FROM NUMBERS!

You know, with a site like this, I’d like to seek answers, prompt a debate and ask some really big dumb questions that baffle me eg  We’re told we have to either go OUT or UP because there’ll be a million more people living here within the next twelve years.  Has anyone ever asked Is this really such a great idea anyway?  How big should a city become?  What are the alternatives? I was reading stuff like The Club Of Rome and the predictions of Ralph Nader in the early seventies where the warnings about today’s biggest planetary head-aches were being flagged (food shortage, climate control, and the one everyone seems to have stigmatized - Population Growth) Probably the most serious dilemma of this new century.  How come our appointed leaders wants to lower their IQ and arrogantly expand?  IS THAT A DUMB QUESTION?  Please don’t tell me that the answer’s anything to do with the masculine insecurity that SIZE MATTERS.

MarvellousMelbourne should be an essential one-stop shopping spot for our up to the minute news… or serious referencing.  But more importantly it must be a crucial WEAPON for all of us to consolidate and declare the size and diversity of our membership.

This website is our forum, our meeting-hall, our martialling yard, our source of energy.  I’m sorry Mr Screaming Developer, you got it wrong, but WE are the tidal wave!

(GR takes mobile phone call)

Late news to hand -  an urgent dispatch has just been placed on the site.  Planning Minister Madden, as we know  has not been able to attend today but has cleared an exclusive interview for this meeting and posted it onto our website.  Let’s click onto that.

(run Clark/Dawe clip)

….And on that note I am honoured to declare MarvellousMelbourne.org OPEN 

More Geoffrey Rush on YouTube     More Geoffrey Rush on Google

]]>
Political donations linked to developers, contractors http://marvellousmelbourne.org/drupal/?q=node/167 2008-07-07T19:58:47-04:00 2008-10-03T06:48:02-04:00 Mary Drost CORPORATE donors to the Victorian Labor Party are almost invariably companies with lucrative public contracts or development, gaming or alcohol interests at the mercy of Government discretion.
An investigation by The Age has also revealed a correlation in the timing of developer donations and key planning decisions. These projects include the $600 million Martha Cove marina at Safety Beach, the redevelopment of the Lombard paper warehouse in Flemington, and the $650 million Burwood Heights residential and commercial precinct.

]]>
CORPORATE donors to the Victorian Labor Party are almost invariably companies with lucrative public contracts or development, gaming or alcohol interests at the mercy of Government discretion.
An investigation by The Age has also revealed a correlation in the timing of developer donations and key planning decisions. These projects include the $600 million Martha Cove marina at Safety Beach, the redevelopment of the Lombard paper warehouse in Flemington, and the $650 million Burwood Heights residential and commercial precinct.

Royce Millar  July 7, 2008
http://www.theage.com.au/national/political-donations-linked-to-developers-contractors-20080706-32n5.html?page=-1

While there is no proof that money has bought influence, there is little doubt that many in the property industry are encouraged to believe that financial contributions to the governing party help their cause.

It seems that donations also buy access and time for big and small contributors alike. "Yes it gives them (companies) a bit more time in the sun," a Labor insider well versed in raising cash admitted.

The Age investigation - which coincides with federal and state inquiries into political funding and disclosure - also found that:

-  Between 2000 and 2007, donors to the ALP either had, or later won, government contracts totalling more than $15 billion.

-  Of the 44 corporate donors to the Victorian ALP in 2006 and 2007, more than three-quarters were in property, infrastructure, alcohol or gaming, and/or had contracts with the Government.

-  In the same year, half of all contributors to Labor's fund-raising arm, Progressive Business, were involved in the property or infrastructure industries. They included Connex, Yarra Trams, Connect East and Keane Australia, the company overseeing the introduction of the troubled myki transport ticket system.

-  Of the 56 named contributors to Progressive Business in 2006, 75% had some direct contractual or planning relationship with the Government.

-  An ALP insider has confirmed the party deliberately targets companies in "regulation high"and "issues rich" industries: development, infrastructure, gaming, alcohol and, in the past, tobacco.

-  A source said the party also encourages annual donations rather than larger one-off amounts. This helps with budgeting but also reduces suspicion about the timing of large gifts.

The Age has quizzed a number of companies about their policies on donations. Many chose not to comment, including Grocon director Daniel Grollo, the Reading entertainment group, and Watsons Consulting, which is involved in the Martha Cove and Wyndham Harbour projects.

Train operator Connex acknowledged a $30,000 donation to the Victorian ALP in 2003-04, but stressed it had not made any direct political donations since. However, the company remains a member of Progressive Business.

Rattled in particular by allegations of corruption in NSW - notably at Wollongong Council- both Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and NSW Premier Maurice Iemma have called for Australia's political funding and disclosure system to be cleaned up.

Under current rules, there is no cap on political donations from individuals, companies or unions. Only donations of more than $10,500 must be declared to the Australian Electoral Commission. Details are not made public until months later. Local councillors in Victoria are supposed to declare gifts of more than $500. But to access such information, the public must fill out a request form at relevant council offices.

Federal Labor wants to introduce a disclosure threshold of $1000. But the Rudd Government has not taken a position on banning or capping donations. It also faces the vexed question of whether to clamp down on union donations.

The issue has been less topical in Victoria. Labor insiders say the ALP does well out of the big end of town and that the Premier is content with the current system.

But some, including senior party figures, say there is no less corruption in Victoria, just less exposure due to the absence of an independent anti-corruption commission. "We haven't had the scandals but it's just a matter of time," one Labor MP said.

The Victorian Liberals - without union friends and heavily reliant on corporate bankrolling- are not seeking the moral high ground on political funding in Victoria. Opposition Leader Ted Baillieu said he opposed a ban on donations, especially when trade unions were free to spend millions campaigning on behalf of the ALP without declaring such spending.

He said he was comfortable with existing arrangements requiring only donations of more than $10,500 to be declared. "People seeking to inappropriately influence politicians are likely to use means other than donations." But Mr Baillieu said he supported more regular and timely disclosure of donations.

The messy mix of money and politics is hardly new. Developers in particular have told The Age that the Kennett government relied a great deal on their good will. One prominent property figure recalled a late-1990s phone call from a senior Liberal fund-raiser. "He called and said, 'I've put you down for $100,000, OK?', " chortled the developer.

In a new submission to to the State Government, Monash University Governance Research Unit co-director Ken Coghill has called for a ban on corporate donations. Dr Coghill, a former Labor MP, wants the Brumby Government to back changes in funding and disclosure laws.

"I am very uncomfortable with the coincidence of political donations and contracts and other government decisions. John Brumby and the Labor Party have nothing to lose and everything to gain by instituting a regime which will protect the integrity of government."

The Age sought an interview with Mr Brumby, but his office referred the matter to Treasurer John Lenders. Mr Lenders declined an interview and through a spokesman provided a brief written statement: "The Victorian Government supports the Federal Government's proposals to strengthen national political donation laws."

In a response to a question about the possible influence of donations in the handling of the $400 million Kew Cottages redevelopment, the spokesman highlighted that the companies concerned - Walker Corporation and Mirvac - had also donated to the Liberal Party in recent years.

The spokesman also stressed that the Bracks and Brumby governments had directed ministers not to engage with companies during tender processes.

]]>
Demands from Planning Backlash Rally - July 6, 2008 http://marvellousmelbourne.org/drupal/?q=node/138 2008-07-06T06:22:01-04:00 2008-07-07T08:12:51-04:00 Mary Drost STATEMENT

In the Planning Policy of the Labor Party in 1999 Mr. Bracks promised to....
give Victorians back their voice and influence over decisions that affect their lifestyles.

]]>
STATEMENT

In the Planning Policy of the Labor Party in 1999 Mr. Bracks promised to....
give Victorians back their voice and influence over decisions that affect their lifestyles.
...to clearly define and strengthen local government's role in planning based on proper strategic and policy statements that maximise the benefits to the community at large.  These include neighbourhood character, local heritage and protection of the natural environment.
He said..."Planning and development in Victoria in the 21st century requires the fostering of partnerships between those involved...residents, councils and the development sector."

WE DEMAND...

...that the State Government dispenses with the proposed takeover of Council planning powers and STRENGTHENS the role of Local Government in the planning process...(as promised.)
...that the State Government gives Victorians their voice and influence over decisions that affect their lifestyles (as promised) and immediately dispenses with the proposed removal of residents' rights to object to and appeal against planning applications.
...that the State Government immediately ceases to impose ad hoc decisions on the community and establishes a precise community consultation process that will give Victorians back their voice and influence over decisions that affect their lifestyles (as promised.)
 

]]>
Planning Backlash Rally Report - "A Great Success" http://marvellousmelbourne.org/drupal/?q=node/136 2008-07-06T05:03:43-04:00 2008-08-10T04:43:24-04:00 Mary Drost Planning Backlash Public Meeting - Moonee Ponds Clocktower Hall - July 6, 2008

WELCOME       Rod Quantock / Mary Drost   - MC's
APOLOGIES

  • Planning Minister Justin Madden (had family  commitments but we are still a little hopeful)
  • Matthew Guy (Shadow Planning Minister) (overseas)
  • Peter Kavanagh (DLP)(country commitments)
  • Paul Mees (previously Melb Uni. Now RMIT & thorn in government's side )- (Interstate)
  • Claude Ullin - Mayor of Stonnington

Linked Content:

]]>
Planning Backlash Public Meeting - Moonee Ponds Clocktower Hall - July 6, 2008

WELCOME       Rod Quantock / Mary Drost   - MC's
APOLOGIES

  • Planning Minister Justin Madden (had family  commitments but we are still a little hopeful)
  • Matthew Guy (Shadow Planning Minister) (overseas)
  • Peter Kavanagh (DLP)(country commitments)
  • Paul Mees (previously Melb Uni. Now RMIT & thorn in government's side )- (Interstate)
  • Claude Ullin - Mayor of Stonnington

Linked Content:

<!--break-->

Planning Backlash Public Meeting
Photo Gallery
Click to see ALL Photos

www.tonymichael.com.au

SPEAKERS 

]]>
Geoffrey Rush to the barricades over planning laws http://marvellousmelbourne.org/drupal/?q=node/126 2008-07-04T07:31:24-04:00 2008-07-07T08:19:47-04:00 Mary Drost Geraldine Mitchell  July 04, 2008 12:00am
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,23964684-2862,00.html

OSCAR-winner Geoffrey Rush will join more than a hundred activist groups to declare war on the State Government's changes to planning laws at a rally on Sunday.

]]>
Geraldine Mitchell  July 04, 2008 12:00am
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,23964684-2862,00.html

OSCAR-winner Geoffrey Rush will join more than a hundred activist groups to declare war on the State Government's changes to planning laws at a rally on Sunday.

Rush told the Herald Sun high-profile battles to stop big developments in the inner-city were now just the "tip of a very large iceberg".

"One hundred-plus groups are now rallying around the planning issues pervading Melbourne," he said. "It is a topic kept very quiet by the Government.

Rush said the public anger was acknowledged and then readily dismissed: "We now need to look under the waterline and see what's really going on."

About 120 groups from across Melbourne and country Victoria are expected to join the 2pm rally at Moonee Ponds Town Hall to fight the Government's takeover of planning powers from councils, as well as changes to residential zones.

Rally spokeswoman Mary Drost said the new residential zones would remove rights to be notified of planning applications and to object or appeal, and would impose unacceptable height limits in all residential areas across Victoria.

Mrs Drost said protesters would also argue that planning powers had been stripped from councils without any consultation.

" 'We're mad as hell and we're not going to take this any more' will be the catch-cry at the rally," she said.

Mrs Drost said organisers had called on Planning Minister Justin Madden to explain the Government's action at the rally, but he was not expected to attend.

But she said Opposition planning spokesman David Davis and Greens MP Greg Barber would address the rally, as would representatives from other groups across the state, including those fighting the bay dredging and desalination plant.

Rush will launch a website at the rally, aimed at bringing together activist groups from across Melbourne and country and coastal Victoria to fight what they describe as an attack on democratic rights.

He said the site, created by a group of volunteers, was designed to unite planning backlash groups from across Victoria.

"We believe that city, coast and country are becoming scarred with insensitive and unrepresentative developments, which are being built to benefit developers and to pacify political impatience," Rush said.

"Planning backlash groups are not bonded by politics or geography, but are united in passion, expertise and resilience regarding our collective opposition to the inappropriate development happening in our communities."

 

]]>
Blue wedges under attack by state & federal governments http://marvellousmelbourne.org/drupal/?q=node/91 2008-06-18T23:54:01-04:00 2008-07-07T08:20:48-04:00 drostmary

Costs pursued against dredge protesters | The Australian

Ewin Hannan | June 19, 2008
THE Rudd and Brumby governments have been accused of trying to send a prominent environmental protest group "out of business" by pursuing legal costs over a failed bid to stop Victoria's channel deepening project.

]]>

Costs pursued against dredge protesters | The Australian

Ewin Hannan | June 19, 2008
THE Rudd and Brumby governments have been accused of trying to send a prominent environmental protest group "out of business" by pursuing legal costs over a failed bid to stop Victoria's channel deepening project.

The two Labor governments are seeking legal costs from the protest group Blue Wedges over its unsuccessful Federal Court challenge to the project.

Federal Court judge Tony North dismissed the challenge in March, finding that Blue Wedges had not established that federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett had failed to act in accordance with the law.

Blue Wedges spokeswoman Jenny Warfe said the action by the two governments would, if successful, financially cripple the organisation that is largely funded by public donations.

"It would put us out of business as an incorporated association presumably," Ms Warfe told The Australian.

"We hope that doesn't occur because there is still a role for our association we'd say in monitoring this project.

"On the face of it, it would look as though we'd be out of business."

Victorian Ports Minister Tim Pallas yesterday confirmed the Government would be pursuing costs against Blue Wedges.

"The federal and state government are seeking costs, as is commonplace for the successful litigants in court proceedings," a spokeswoman for Mr Pallas said.

The move against Blue Wedges comes days after opponents of Victoria's $3.1 billion desalination plant were ordered to pay potentially massive legal costs over another failed court challenge.

The protest group, Your Water Your Say, claim they could face costs of $200,000 if the Brumby Government pursues last week's Federal Court costs order.

The group accused the state and federal governments of trying to gag criticism of the controversial project.

Water Minister Tim Holding yesterday left open the prospect of pursuing costs against Your Water Your Say.

Ms Warfe said Blue Wedges was concerned about the implications of last week's costs order.

She said the group has spent about $50,000 fighting the dredging project over the past three years, with the funds being contributed by members.

She said Blue Wedges would argue its legal challenge was justified as it had pursued areas of federal environment law that had not been tested by the court.

It would also argue that there was considerable public interest in pursuing the case.

Blue Wedges lawyer Michael Moorhead said the governments' pursuit of costs could silence community groups.

The Port of Melbourne Corporation yesterday released its latest update on the channel deepening project which it said showed the dredging continued to operate within environmental guidelines.

About 3.8 million cubic metres have been dredged - 16 per cent of the project - and the corporation maintained it was on schedule and within budget.

But Ms Warfe said it was "still a very contentious issue that they're merrily constructing an unlicensed toxic waste facility".

 

]]>